尼·斯特拉霍夫是對19世紀俄國文學(xué)影響深遠的思想家、政論家。他對普希金、屠格涅夫、赫爾岑、陀思妥耶夫斯基、托爾斯泰等人的解讀很大影響了后世對這些經(jīng)典作家的評價。他的《關(guān)于普希金的札記及其他詩人》《赫爾岑的文學(xué)活動》、關(guān)于《罪與罰》、關(guān)于《戰(zhàn)爭與和平》的批評四部曲，對普希金創(chuàng)作中的別爾金傳統(tǒng)、赫爾岑對西方的絕望以及對俄羅斯的回歸、托爾斯泰創(chuàng)作中的俄羅斯人形象等等，都做了新的闡釋，大大豐富了我們對19世紀俄國文學(xué)經(jīng)典的認知。而因為我國俄蘇文學(xué)譯介的歷史原因，經(jīng)典作家被推上前臺，斯特拉霍夫的文學(xué)批評卻久被遺忘。本著對斯特拉霍夫的思想再探索，是因為他認識到了19世紀俄國文學(xué)批評保守的一面，堅持對虛無主義的反駁，堅持對俄國文化民族特性的開掘，而這對于我們思考文化的交融與爆發(fā)中，如何對接民族文化特質(zhì)，有著極大啟發(fā)。
朱建剛
----------------------------
朱建剛，蘇州大學(xué)外國語學(xué)院教授，博士生導(dǎo)師。莫斯科國立大學(xué)語文系訪問學(xué)者（2012-2013）；俄羅斯科學(xué)院高爾基世界文學(xué)研究所訪問學(xué)者（2017-2018），著有《普羅米修斯的“墮落”：俄國文學(xué)知識分子形象研究》（人民文學(xué)出版社，2006年），國家社科基金成果文庫《十九世紀下半期俄國反虛無主義文學(xué)研究》（北京大學(xué)出版社，2015年）等作品。
導(dǎo)論·······································································································1
第一節(jié) 斯特拉霍夫生平···································································2
第二節(jié) 國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀··································································14
第三節(jié) 研究的意義及思路······························································46
第一章 文學(xué)批評主題之一：斯特拉霍夫與俄國反虛無主義···············49
第一節(jié) 作為思想背景的俄國虛無主義··············································49
第二節(jié) 斯特拉霍夫的反虛無主義觀及其發(fā)展····································51
第三節(jié) 斯特拉霍夫反虛無主義的來源··············································56
第二章 文學(xué)批評主題之二：斯特拉霍夫論俄國民族文化特性···········61
第一節(jié) 《致命的問題》及其影響·····················································61
第二節(jié) 民族的還是世界的——與弗拉基米爾·索洛維約夫的爭論·······68
第三章 戲仿與文學(xué)傳統(tǒng)——斯特拉霍夫論普希金····························85
第一節(jié) 斯特拉霍夫的普希金研究·····················································86
第二節(jié) 斯特拉霍夫普希金研究的背景··············································92
第三節(jié) 斯特拉霍夫普希金研究的根源及影響····································97
第四章 一位西歐派的沒落——斯特拉霍夫論屠格涅夫····················103
第一節(jié) 關(guān)于《父與子》································································104
第二節(jié) 關(guān)于《煙》及其他····························································109
第三節(jié) 《屠格涅夫的最新作品》及《關(guān)于屠格涅夫的追思會》········116
第五章 另一位西歐派的回歸——斯特拉霍夫論赫爾岑····················123
第一節(jié) 斯特拉霍夫論赫爾岑·························································124
第二節(jié) 赫爾岑與虛無主義者的出路···············································130
第三節(jié) 《赫爾岑》的影響····························································134
第六章 論斯特拉霍夫?qū)ν铀纪滓蛩够年U釋······························141
第一節(jié) 關(guān)于《罪與罰》的評論······················································143
第二節(jié) 真正的虛無主義者與苦難···················································147
第三節(jié) 真實與幻想性：關(guān)于《白癡》的爭論··································155
第四節(jié) 病態(tài)與狂熱：斯特拉霍夫的蓋棺論定··································163
第七章 生命意識與民族根基：斯特拉霍夫?qū)ν袪査固┑年U釋··········167
第一節(jié) 從相識到相知···································································168
第二節(jié) 斯特拉霍夫?qū)ν袪査固┰缙谧髌返脑u論·······························173
第三節(jié) 對《戰(zhàn)爭與和平》（1863—1869）的闡釋····························179
第四節(jié) 對《安娜·卡列尼娜》（1873—1877）的意見及闡釋············191
第五節(jié) 未完成的對話——斯特拉霍夫與托爾斯泰的爭論··················202
第八章 斯特拉霍夫事件及其意義··················································219
第一節(jié) 陀思妥耶夫斯基與斯特拉霍夫············································221
第二節(jié) 第三者：托爾斯泰····························································225
第三節(jié) 獨白與對話之爭································································231
結(jié)語： 斯特拉霍夫文學(xué)批評的準則、意義及其他······························235
第一節(jié) 批評的準則······································································238
第二節(jié) 批評的意義······································································243
第三節(jié) 批評的局限性···································································247
參考文獻······················································································253
斯特拉霍夫生平簡歷·····································································266
附錄： 斯特拉霍夫論托爾斯泰《戰(zhàn)爭與和平》四部曲譯文·················270
后記····························································································380
書單推薦
